← All proof

Situation

  • Life-science company in clinical training
  • Custom pressure-sensor board, provenance lost
  • Silicone training phantom with embedded masses
  • No schematic, firmware source or protocol spec
  • No calibration certificate
  • Original developer no longer available
  • Target environment: a consulting room with no network

Challenge

The pad emitted numbers, and nothing was known about them:

  • The wire format, framing and sample rate were undocumented
  • Channel order did not correspond to physical sensor position
  • Readings were dimensionless counts, while the curriculum teaches force in Newtons
  • No reference load cell was available to calibrate against
  • The square sensor grid had to map onto an anatomical surface
  • Results had to reach the study from a machine with no connectivity

What dataMaven delivered

Each layer had to be established by measurement before the one above it was possible:

  • Characterised the serial protocol empirically — wire format, framing and rate
  • Recovered the channel-to-position map by stimulating each sensor in a known order
  • Built a per-sensor force model from repeated loading at known masses
  • Fitted response curves with an explicit, measured saturation ceiling per sensor
  • Mapped the square sensor grid onto the anatomical outline with a radial warp
  • Built a guided exam that advances on the learner’s actions rather than button presses
  • Scored coverage and applied pressure separately, against configurable ground truth
  • Packaged the whole thing as an offline desktop application with durable local records

Technology

ReactTypeScriptWeb SerialElectronPythonNumPySciPyViteGitHub Actions

The build, end to end

Characterised
Serial protocol probe · Wire format & framing · Sample rate · Channel map recovery
Calibrated
Known-mass loading · Per-sensor response curves · Saturation ceilings · Error characteristics
Modelled
Radial grid-to-surface warp · Shared geometry module · Coverage model · Ground-truth scoring
Built
Guided exam walkthrough · Live pressure & coverage feedback · Actionable debrief · Operator & participant views
Delivered
Offline desktop application · Versioned self-describing records · Hardware documentation · Deployment guide

Outcome

A calibrated trainer running beside the rig, and a written record of what the numbers mean:

  • Force reported in Newtons, per sensor, with known error characteristics
  • A single decoding module owning the wire format, so firmware revisions are a one-file change
  • Live pressure and coverage feedback during the exam
  • A debrief expressed as something the learner can go back and do differently
  • Every exported record carrying the calibration it depends on
  • Fully offline operation, with results accumulating into one collectable file
  • Hardware and deployment documentation stating what is measured and what is provisional

Key insight

An instrument that cannot state its own error is not an instrument. A trainer showing a plausible force reading on an uncalibrated rig teaches the wrong technique with total confidence — so the application reports Newtons or it reports nothing.

Engagement snapshot

Life sciences / clinical training
Sector
3 weeks, greenfield
Engagement
16-taxel FSR matrix
Sensor array
USB serial, 5 Hz
Interface
8 Python instruments
Measurement tooling
Offline Windows desktop
Delivery
56 across 7 reviewed merges
Commits

Deliverables

  • Device Characterisation & Hardware Documentation
  • Per-Sensor Force Calibration
  • Guided Clinical Training Application
  • Operator Tooling & Scoring Configuration
  • Offline Desktop Packaging & CI Pipeline
  • Deployment Guide

What changed — week by week

Week 1Protocol characterisation & channel mapping
Week 1Force calibration from known masses
Week 2Grid-to-surface geometry & coverage model
Week 2Guided exam & live feedback
Week 3Debrief, scoring & operator tooling
Week 3Offline desktop packaging & documentation
This engagement is how we approach systems whose behaviour has to be established before it can be trusted.Enterprise Architecture

Facing a complex landscape — or an ambitious build — and a decision you need to make with confidence? That’s the work.

Book a 45-min intro